首 页
概 况
行业资讯
会员之家
活动专辑
学术研究
站内搜索
机构杂志
 
数据加载中...
数据加载中...
专题展示
中日韩国际知识
“一带一路”暨
美国知识产权法
·全国知识产权研究会工作
·“十三五”时期知识产权
·中国知识产权研究会第六
·《知识产权》杂志理事会
机构杂志 您现在的位置:首页 > 机构杂志 > 百家争鸣  
百家争鸣  
反不正当竞争法视野下对商标法若干问题的新思考

中国知识产权研究会网站
   [    ]
 

卢海君

    内容提要:商标法的立法目的具有层次性,其根本目的具有公益性,是通过赋予并保护商标权的方式予以实现的。商标法是反不正当竞争法的有机组成部分,并非保护私权的私法。商标权的权利属性应为准财产权或有限的财产权,此财产权的效力仅止于防止混淆的发生。商标权的财产权属性仅在商标转让、许可或企业并购的过程中显现,其基础是其所承载的商誉。

    关 键 词:商标法   反不正当竞争法   准财产权

    Abstract: As part of anti-unfair competition law, trademark law does not construct an absolute private right rather than maintain a fair competition market and protect legitimate interests of consumers (i.e. the ultimate end) through the protection of a private right (i.e. the direct end). Considering trademark law as an absolute private law, whether the rightholders of a trademark is entitled to prevent others from using his/her mark in the new environment shall be examined without justified answers.Anti-unfair competition law, however, where trademark use results in confusion or misleading, shall be examined with clear conclusions. Based on the end and the attribute of trademark law, trademark right should be a kind of quasi-property right or limited property right. There is no right in trademark beyond prohibition of confusion. The property attributes of trademark shall occur in process of assignment and licensing of trademark or mergers and acquisitions based on the goodwill symbolized by the trademark. Trademark right roots in trademark use.

    Key Words:  trademark law; anti-unfair competition law; quasi-property rights

 

发布日期:2015-12-03
 
相关文档
·转换的范式:反思知识产权理论 08-05
·认真对待游戏著作权 03-04
·我国知识产权判例的规范性探讨 02-14
·关于反不正当竞争法的几点思考 10-28
·论商标禁止注册事由概括性条款的解释冲突 09-01
联系我们  |  关于我们
北京赢在龙头信息技术有限公司
地址:北京市海淀区大柳树路17号富海国际港1206
电话:010-68799639      京ICP备10022873号 京公网安备 11010802023817号