张    玲      王   果

    内容提要：随着上海市等地区政策性文件的相继出台，专利使用权“能不能”出资的适格性问题已经解决。由此，探讨“如何出资”成为当前制度构建的关键。专利使用权出资的客体、主体是否应该予以限制，各地区规定不一致，司法实务中的案例也不尽相同。为了维持《专利法》和《公司法》规范之间的协调，平衡出资人与受资公司之间的利益，建议将专利使用权出资的客体限定为独占许可使用权，排他、普通许可使用权不宜进行出资。将专利使用权出资的主体限定为发明专利权人，被许可人以及实用新型、外观设计专利权人不宜进行出资。

    关 键 词：专利使用权   非货币财产出资   独占许可使用权   发明专利权人

    Abstract: As policy documents of Shanghai and other regions have been issued, it is not disputable of the eligibility of patent licensing right as investment. Thereby, the controversy about “how to invest” has been the key issue of current system construction. It is inconsistent among regional regulations and cases in judicial practice whether the object and the subject of investment should be restricted. In order to maintain the coordination between the company law and the patent law and to balance the benefits between investors and companies, it is suggested that the object of investment should be limited to monopolized licensing right, while exclusive and ordinary licensing right are not qualified, and the subject of investment should be limited to patentee of invention, while the licensee and the patentee of utility model and design patent are not eligible.

    Key Words: patent licensing right; non-monetary property investment; monopolized licensing right; patentee of invention patent