1. What comments can you share on the performance of the Shanghai IP Court to date?

请就上海知识产权法院设立以来的审判结果从你们的角度做个评价。

2. What is the relative level of success of the Court, or particularly successful aspect of the court? 

请谈一下您认为知识产权法院设立至今有哪些特别成功之处。

3. What lessons could IP practitioners learn from the cases you have heard?

贵院认为知识产权从业人员从贵院过去审理过的案件中可以汲取哪些经验教训？

4. How did the technical inquisitors of the court do as compared to initial expectation? What are their most significant contribution to the hearing process?

技术调查官在审判过程中的作用与预想的比较如何？你们觉得他们对你们最大的帮助是什么？

5. Do the parties have a right, or allowed, to know what evidence and opinion the technical inquisitor has provided to the judges? Will the parties be allowed or have a right to cross-examine the technical inquisitor on such opinion and evidence?

当事人是否有权或可以知道，在审理过程中技术调查官为法官提供了哪些意见和证据？

当事人是否有权或可以在审理当中就技术调查官提供的意见和证据进行质询？

6. Can you please explain the types of IP actions that you are dealing with most? For example, for trademark cases, are they mostly appeals from the CTMO/TRAB, or is there a relatively high percentage of infringement actions as well?

能否介绍一下，在贵院已处理过的知识产权案件中，哪些类型的案件比重较大？比如商标案件中，大部份是对商标局/商标评审委员会的决定提出的上诉呢，还是有很多侵权诉讼呢？

7. Can you explain the differences between the simplified and regular hearing procedures, and explain which type of procedure is appropriate in which case?

能否详细解释一下简化审判程序和常规审判程序之间的区别，并介绍一下哪类案件适用哪种程序？

8. Do you have internal deadlines to meet when hearing cases and issuing decisions, or are timeframes left up to individual judges?

贵院内部对审理过程和公布判决书等各阶段进程时间表是否有内定期限，还是由办案法官自行决定处理？

9. Where are your judges coming from? Have some of them worked at SIPO or SAIC before graduating to the IP Courts?

能否介绍贵院的法官来源情况？比如，他们中有多少是先有在国家知识产权局或国家工商行政管理总局工作的经验，然后来法院就职的？有法官有在律师事务所工作经验的吗？比例是多少？

10. Are all or most judges legally qualified?

是不是所有或大多数法官都具有法律资格？

11. Regarding litigations related to employee inventor remuneration, how is the law being interpreted by the court? For example, how do you determine reasonable amounts to pay inventors? Are trade secrets subject to remuneration, and if so, how to implement this?  Under what circumstances, if any, have employment agreements not been upheld by the court? 

就有关职务发明人报酬的诉讼而言，贵院对相关法规是如何解释的？例如，如何确定应给予发明人或设计人的“合理的报酬”？提出商业秘密的员工也可获得报酬么？如过可以的话，怎样给予报酬？什么情况下法院不支持与员工签订的协议？有出现过这种情况的判例吗？

12. Regarding the Interpretation (II) by the Supreme People's Court on some Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Disputes, what lessons do you think, based on your experience, the IP practitioners could learn?

关于最高院专利侵权司法解释（二）的实施，贵院根据你们的经验是否对从业人员有所建议？

13. What experiences and comments do you have on cases related to abuse of IPR? Is there a recent trend that such cases are on the rise? 

贵院对审判滥用知识产权的案件有什么体会？这类案件近来有增长趋势吗？

14. Under the current court practice in China, what percentage of preliminary injunction applications is granted? What is the standard or criteria for granting a preliminary injunction application?  Will the criteria change depending on the type of the intellectual property or type of patent that is involved?

目前中国司法实践中，法院对诉前禁令申请的核准比例以及核准的具体条件或标准？基于知识产权类型及专利类型的不同是否在核准条件和标准方面存在一定差异.

15. How do the courts see the role and effect of evaluation or assessment reports in utility model and design patent disputes? What is the court’s view, how will the court dispose the case, if the results of the evaluation report by the plaintiff are unfavorable to the plaintiff, but the defendant never invokes an invalidation proceeding?

司法实践中，法院对实用新型和外观设计的专利权评价报告的地位和效力是何态度？如果原告作出的评价报告结果不利，但被告始终不提专利无效，法院的处理态度如何?

16. Under the current judicial practice, what is the relevant standard for granting an application for evidence preservation order.  What is the rate of approval for allocation for preservation of evidence?

目前司法实践中，法院对当事人证据保全申请的相关核准条件或标准如何？证据保全申请的核准率如何？

17. What is the current judicial practice regarding the specific standards for design patent infringement determination of specific methods and standards? In view that the recent amendment to the Chinese Patent Law added a condition for granting a design application, namely, it must be obviously different; and that the most recent amendment to the Chinese Patent Law extended design protection to “partial designs,”  will this affect the current infringement test for designs, e.g. the principle of “observing the entirety” and “considering as a whole”

目前中国司法实践中有关外观设计专利权的侵权判定的具体方式和标准如何？基于新专利法中增加了外观设计专利申请的“明显区别”条件以及专利法修改建议稿增加了“局部设计”外观申请，是否将会对当前的“整体观察、综合判断”的侵权判定方式和判定标准产生影响？

18. What is the court’s view on introducing punitive damages in IP infringement cases?

司法实践中，中国法院目前对引入知识产权侵权的惩罚性赔偿的看法如何？