1. What comments can you share on the implementation of the three specialized IP courts in view of their performance so far?

请就三个知识产权法院设立以来的表现从你们的角度做个评价。

2. What is the relative level of success of the program?

请谈一下您认为设立专门知识产权法院至今有哪些成功之处。

3. Is there any planned adjustment to the program? Is there planned expansion to more regions?

请问是否有计划进一步调整改进知识产权法院的结构和运作？有计划在更多地区推广专门知产法院吗？

4. Have you heard any appeals from the IP courts? If so, in your view, what lessons could IP practitioners learn based on your view of these appeals?  

请问最高人民法院有没有审理过就知识产权法院判决提起的上诉？如果审理过的话，贵院认为知识产权从业人员可从这些上诉案中汲取哪些经验教训？

5. Regarding litigations related to employee inventor remuneration, how is the law being interpreted by the court? For example, how do you determine reasonable amounts to pay inventors? Are trade secrets subject to remuneration, and if so, how to implement this?  Under what circumstances, if any, have employment agreements not been upheld by the court? 

就有关职务发明人报酬的诉讼而言，贵院对相关法规是如何解释的？例如，如何确定应给予发明人或设计人的“合理的报酬”？提出商业秘密的员工也可获得报酬么？如过可以的话，怎样给予报酬？什么情况下法院不支持与员工签订的协议？有出现过这种情况的判例吗？

6. Regarding the Interpretation (II) by the Supreme People's Court on some Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Patent Infringement Disputes, have you had any experience or received any reports on application of these interpretations by the courts? If so, do you have any comments?

关于专利侵权司法解释（二），下级法院是否已就履行相关解释做出过汇报？如有，请对这些汇报进行简单总结评价。

7. Could you please comment on the following issues related to the Interpretation (II)?

- Article 6 (claim construction based on related patents): will the court ever consider the file history of any related foreign patent on claim construction? If so, under what circumstances?

- Article 7 (infringement of close-ended composition claim): what is the rationale for excluding application of this article to claims for compositions of traditional Chinese medicine?

- Article 14 (effect of design space on relatively small distinction in designs): Could you please clarify the meaning of the term “design space”?

- Article 18 (compensation for infringement between publication of application and grant): Is licensing fee the only permitted basis for calculating the adequate compensation? Will loss of the patentee, profit by the infringer, or prescribed statutory damage be considered?

- Article 25 – (unknowingly infringing):  This article provides exclusion for infringing goods purchased from a legitimate source “at reasonable price,” where the patentee may not be able to stop the purchaser from using, selling or offering for sales of such goods. What is the purpose of, and rationale for, this exclusion?

请对司法解释（二）的以下条款给与进一步解答：

第六条（基于相关专利解释权利要求）：法院在解释权利要求时，会考虑相关国外申请的审查档案吗？什么情况下会予以考虑？

第七条（封闭式组合物权利要求的侵权认定）该款规定不适用于中药组合物权利要求，是基于什么原因和考虑？

第十四条（设计空间影响不同外观设计之间较小区别的效果）请解释下“设计空间”的涵义？

第十八条（公开后、授权前实施专利的适当费用）专利许可使用费是适当费用的唯一判断基础吗？还可以考虑权利人的损失、侵权人的获利以及法定赔偿额吗？

第二十五条（不知道侵权）本条规定不适于侵权产品有“合法来源”且“已支付该产品的合理对价”的情况，这种情况下，权利人不能制止购买侵权产品的人使用、销售或许诺销售这种侵权产品。为何这种情况要算例外？出于什么考虑？

8. Following the judicial interpretation on patent infringement issues, is the court considering providing judicial interpretation on issues concerning the patent application, re-examination, and invalidation procedures?

继关于专利侵权司法解释之后，有考虑发布关于审理专利授权确权问题的司法解释吗?

9. When do you expect to publish your judicial interpretation on issues related to trademark application, enforcement, and administrative proceedings?

有望近期发布关于审理商标授权确权、行政案件问题的司法解释或规定吗？

10. Will the court provide any guidelines or judicial interpretation on abuse of IPR in the near future?

贵院近期会就滥用知识产权问题做出指导或制定司法解释吗？

11. What is the court’s view on introducing punitive damages in IP infringement cases?

司法实践中，中国法院目前对引入知识产权侵权的惩罚性赔偿的看法如何？